Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation
Date: 2017-06-19 15:49:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoboZn3ppQxeQ5QnzetFUn1bECkXgvF5pkXyj=912tkTcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
>> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really
>> seriously against that?
>
> I think it would be better to have it separate.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-06-19 15:59:05 Re: [BUGS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2017-06-19 15:40:11 Re: Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger