Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: 'Michael Meskes' <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?
Date: 2017-06-07 14:17:02
Message-ID: 20170607141702.vfyriqgq2pwgzoqi@feivel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:45:23AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Could you also apply it to past versions if you don't mind? The oldest supported version 9.2 is already thread-aware.

Done.

My standard workflow is to wait a couple days to see if everything works nicely before backporting. Obviously this doesn't make any sense for a doc patch, sigh.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-06-07 14:43:16 Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-07 13:55:29 Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)