From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'Michael Meskes' <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware? |
Date: | 2017-06-07 14:17:02 |
Message-ID: | 20170607141702.vfyriqgq2pwgzoqi@feivel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:45:23AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Could you also apply it to past versions if you don't mind? The oldest supported version 9.2 is already thread-aware.
Done.
My standard workflow is to wait a couple days to see if everything works nicely before backporting. Obviously this doesn't make any sense for a doc patch, sigh.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-07 14:43:16 | Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-07 13:55:29 | Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) |