Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Michael Meskes' <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?
Date: 2017-06-07 03:45:23
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F720716@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Meskes
> I'm pretty sure it is indeed thread-aware, although I didn't provide the
> code for this feature myself.
>
> > So the doc seems to need fix. The patch is attached.
>
> Thanks, applied.

Thank you, I'm relieved.

Could you also apply it to past versions if you don't mind? The oldest supported version 9.2 is already thread-aware.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-06-07 03:48:33 Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-07 03:41:15 Re: Fix tab-completion of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION SET PUBLICATION