Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Michael Meskes' <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is ECPG's SET CONNECTION really not thread-aware?
Date: 2017-06-08 00:23:16
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F721097@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Meskes,

From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Meskes
> Done.

Thanks, I confirmed the commit messages.

> My standard workflow is to wait a couple days to see if everything works
> nicely before backporting. Obviously this doesn't make any sense for a doc
> patch, sigh.

I see. That's a good idea.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-08 00:24:14 Re: Notes on testing Postgres 10b1
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-08 00:07:40 Re: [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message.