Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Date: 2017-04-15 21:34:28
Message-ID: 20170415213428.2buxpnvpokrtthxx@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-04-15 17:30:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2017-04-15 16:48:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Concretely, I propose the attached patch. We'd have to put it into
> >> all supported branches, since culicidae is showing intermittent
> >> "could not reattach to shared memory" failures in all the branches.
>
> > That seems quite reasonable.
>
> Pushed, please update culicidae's settings.

Done, although there were already builds running by the time I got to
it, so there'll be a few unaffected runs. I've increased build
frequency of all branches to be forced once-an-hour, so we can quickly
see how reliable it is. Will turn down Monday or such, if everything
looks good.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-15 22:04:00 OpenSSL support in our back branches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-15 21:34:06 Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken