Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Date: 2017-04-17 15:45:49
Message-ID: 20170417154549.ngigpsstbevah2yd@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-04-15 14:34:28 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-15 17:30:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > On 2017-04-15 16:48:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Concretely, I propose the attached patch. We'd have to put it into
> > >> all supported branches, since culicidae is showing intermittent
> > >> "could not reattach to shared memory" failures in all the branches.
> >
> > > That seems quite reasonable.
> >
> > Pushed, please update culicidae's settings.
>
> Done, although there were already builds running by the time I got to
> it, so there'll be a few unaffected runs. I've increased build
> frequency of all branches to be forced once-an-hour, so we can quickly
> see how reliable it is. Will turn down Monday or such, if everything
> looks good.

Looking through all the branches, it seems to have done the trick - the
previous irregular failures seem to be gone. Nice.

Unless somebody complains, I'll reduce the forced build frequency to
something more normal again.

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2017-04-17 15:47:08 PGCon 2017 registration now open
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-04-17 15:33:19 Re: PANIC in pg_commit_ts slru after crashes