From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging of listen socket creation. |
Date: | 2017-03-14 03:38:42 |
Message-ID: | 20170314033842.st7gifec55yigz2h@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-03-13 10:12:42 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> So now on every startup I get this:
>
> 2017-03-13 10:08:49.399 EDT [90059] LOG: listening on IPv6 address "::1"
> 2017-03-13 10:08:49.399 EDT [90059] LOG: listening on IPv4 address "127.0.0.1"
> 2017-03-13 10:08:49.400 EDT [90059] LOG: listening on Unix address
> "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"
I don't mind the new output, but I kinda wonder whether it's a good idea
to include the '.s.PGSQL.5432' bit in the host and/or whether we
shouldn't include the port in the TCP cases as well
One cannot use -h /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432, making this a bit confusing...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-14 03:43:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging of listen socket creation. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-13 23:06:33 | pgsql: Fix busted markup. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-14 03:43:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve postmaster's logging of listen socket creation. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-14 03:34:14 | Re: scram and \password |