Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Date: 2016-10-03 11:39:15
Message-ID: 20161003063915.750acbf8@slate.meme.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:35:16 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Moved to next CF, the patch still applies. Karl, you have registered
> to review this patch a couple of months back but nothing happened. I
> have removed your name for now. If you have time, don't hesitate to
> come back to it.

Right. Hope to get back to it soon. Won't register until I'm ready
to look at it.

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-10-03 11:51:54 Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading
Previous Message Arthur Silva 2016-10-03 11:26:09 Re: Macro customizable hashtable / bitmapscan & aggregation perf