Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Date: 2016-10-03 04:35:16
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQz3cu6AK2ms2oQn1=m-4M=9xfEhR9VUFcyD7oo4w0R8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Karl O. Pinc <kop(at)meme(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:06:24 +0200
> Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for the patch review and please apologies this too
>> long response delay. I was traveling since end of April and totally
>> forgotten this patch. I have applied all your useful feedbacks on the
>> patch and attached a new one (v4) to this email :
>
> My schedule is really full at the moment. I'll get to this
> when I have a bit of time. If you get anxious please write
> and I'll see about making faster progress.

Moved to next CF, the patch still applies. Karl, you have registered
to review this patch a couple of months back but nothing happened. I
have removed your name for now. If you have time, don't hesitate to
come back to it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 04:44:40 Re: pg_xlogdump follow into the future
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 04:33:02 Re: sequence data type