Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Clément Prévost <prevostclement(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Date: 2016-05-09 01:20:55
Message-ID: 20160509012055.GA433959@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley wrote:

> I'm not entirely sure which machine generates that coverage output,
> but the problem with it is that it's just one machine. We do have at
> least one buildfarm member which runs with force_parallel_mode =
> regress.

It's not a buildfarm machine, but a machine setup specifically for
coverage reports. It runs "make check-world" only. I can add some
additional command(s) to run, if somebody can suggest something.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-05-09 01:27:53 Re: Stopping logical replication protocol
Previous Message David Rowley 2016-05-09 00:46:21 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered