From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Clément Prévost <prevostclement(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered |
Date: | 2016-05-09 02:17:48 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f8XBC1Qy2rguCZ3f1RG12y4s6sgjuhFWA08uFTNQJEN4g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9 May 2016 at 13:20, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> David Rowley wrote:
>
>> I'm not entirely sure which machine generates that coverage output,
>> but the problem with it is that it's just one machine. We do have at
>> least one buildfarm member which runs with force_parallel_mode =
>> regress.
>
> It's not a buildfarm machine, but a machine setup specifically for
> coverage reports. It runs "make check-world" only. I can add some
> additional command(s) to run, if somebody can suggest something.
I'm not familiar with what's possible with make check-world, but would
it be reasonable to make that just do another regression test run with
force_parallel_mode set to regress?
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-09 02:25:48 | Re: First-draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-05-09 01:27:53 | Re: Stopping logical replication protocol |