Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: 2016-04-05 19:09:33
Message-ID: 20160405190933.GA324260@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> OK, thanks for the clarification. Here's the earlier patch, but with
> the relevant added docs and tests retained.

I'd like to add indexes and materialized views to the set of objects
covered (functions and triggers). I'm already doing that, so no need to
resubmit; it should be a pretty easy addition. I've done a few minor
additional changes too.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-04-05 19:25:51 Re: Combining Aggregates
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2016-04-05 19:08:37 Re: pgbench more operators & functions