Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: 2016-04-05 17:43:58
Message-ID: 20160405174358.GA542@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

OK, thanks for the clarification. Here's the earlier patch, but with
the relevant added docs and tests retained.

-- Abhijit

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Implement-ALTER-DEPENDS-ON-EXTENSION-for-functions-a-20160405.2.patch text/x-diff 27.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2016-04-05 17:54:32 Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2016-04-05 17:34:51 Re: LOCK TABLE .. DEFERRABLE