Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Date: 2016-04-05 21:45:58
Message-ID: 20160405214558.GA395316@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> > OK, thanks for the clarification. Here's the earlier patch, but with
> > the relevant added docs and tests retained.
>
> I'd like to add indexes and materialized views to the set of objects
> covered (functions and triggers). I'm already doing that, so no need to
> resubmit; it should be a pretty easy addition. I've done a few minor
> additional changes too.

... and pushed. I changed the regression test a bit more, so please
recheck.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-04-05 21:50:18 Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-04-05 21:29:29 Re: [PATH] Jsonb, insert a new value into an array at arbitrary position