Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date: 2016-03-02 21:26:29
Message-ID: 20160302212629.GA483450@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 07:07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Craig Ringer wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/src/test/perl/TestLib.pm b/src/test/perl/TestLib.pm
> > > index 3d11cbb..8c13655 100644
> > > --- a/src/test/perl/TestLib.pm
> > > +++ b/src/test/perl/TestLib.pm
> > > @@ -112,9 +112,11 @@ INIT
> > > #
> > > sub tempdir
> > > {
> > > + my ($prefix) = @_;
> > > + $prefix = "tmp_test" if (!$prefix);
> >
> > This should be "unless defined $prefix". Otherwise if you pass the
> > string literal "0" as prefix it will be ignored.
> >
> Ha. I thought something was funny with !$prefix when splitting that out of
> Kyotaro Horiguchi's patch but couldn't put my finger on what.
>
> Will amend in the next push.

Pushed it with that fix. I also added a further "data_" prefix, so it's
"data_${name}_XXXX" now. Hopefully this is less problematic than
yesterday's ...

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-02 21:31:48 Re: Random inconsistencies in GiST support function declarations
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-03-02 21:19:53 Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs