| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding |
| Date: | 2016-03-01 15:37:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20160301153742.GA5820@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:19:45AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Two reasons:
> > 1. There is no ideal implementation of DTM which will fit all possible needs
> > and be efficient for all clusters.
>
> Hmm, what is the reasoning behind that statement? I mean, it is
> certainly true that there are some places where we have decided that
> one-size-fits-all is not the right approach. Indexing, for example.
Uh, is that even true of indexing? While the plug-in nature of indexing
allows for easier development and testing, does anyone create plug-in
indexing that isn't shipped by us? I thought WAL support was something
that prevented external indexing solutions from working.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-03-01 15:40:12 | Re: Equivalent of --enable-tap-tests in MSVC scripts |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2016-03-01 15:36:04 | Re: PROPOSAL: Fast temporary tables |