Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Date: 2016-03-01 15:12:28
Message-ID: 20160301151228.GA348575@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I guess that commit fest 2016-03 is going to begin soon, at which
> > point nobody will be able to add new patches because
> > 1) already closed CF don't accept them.
> > 2) A CF currently running neither.
> > I propose to create an extra CF, called "Future" or similar where
> > people will be able to park the patches submitted for the 9.7 cycle.
> > This will be renamed later on as the first CF of 9.7 once the
> > development schedule for 9.7 is decided.
>
> Yeah, we can do that. I'd suggest we either name it based on the current
> tentative date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it more clear.

+1 to both names suggested by Magnus.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-01 15:19:45 Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-01 15:10:12 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.