From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches |
Date: | 2016-03-01 20:28:30 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwLhGwzVqtx72-0xpR+cCTMjOo8dJochiU+QRESOz7K4g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Michael Paquier <
> michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I guess that commit fest 2016-03 is going to begin soon, at which
> > > point nobody will be able to add new patches because
> > > 1) already closed CF don't accept them.
> > > 2) A CF currently running neither.
> > > I propose to create an extra CF, called "Future" or similar where
> > > people will be able to park the patches submitted for the 9.7 cycle.
> > > This will be renamed later on as the first CF of 9.7 once the
> > > development schedule for 9.7 is decided.
> >
> > Yeah, we can do that. I'd suggest we either name it based on the current
> > tentative date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
> > something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it more
> clear.
>
> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>
We do need to pick one of them :)
Anybody else with preferences?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-03-01 20:35:50 | Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-01 20:04:40 | Re: 2016-03 Commitfest Manager |