Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Date: 2016-03-01 20:28:30
Message-ID: CABUevEwLhGwzVqtx72-0xpR+cCTMjOo8dJochiU+QRESOz7K4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Michael Paquier <
> michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I guess that commit fest 2016-03 is going to begin soon, at which
> > > point nobody will be able to add new patches because
> > > 1) already closed CF don't accept them.
> > > 2) A CF currently running neither.
> > > I propose to create an extra CF, called "Future" or similar where
> > > people will be able to park the patches submitted for the 9.7 cycle.
> > > This will be renamed later on as the first CF of 9.7 once the
> > > development schedule for 9.7 is decided.
> >
> > Yeah, we can do that. I'd suggest we either name it based on the current
> > tentative date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
> > something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it more
> clear.
>
> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>

We do need to pick one of them :)

Anybody else with preferences?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2016-03-01 20:35:50 Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-01 20:04:40 Re: 2016-03 Commitfest Manager