| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Partitioning WIP patch |
| Date: | 2015-02-26 18:24:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20150226182416.GE24199@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-02-26 12:15:17 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 26-02-2015 AM 05:15, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > On 02/24/2015 12:13 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> >> Here is an experimental patch that attempts to implement this.
> > I would love to have it for 9.5, but I guess the
> > patch isn't nearly baked enough for that?
> I'm not quite sure what would qualify as baked enough for 9.5 though we
> can surely try to reach some consensus on various implementation aspects
> and perhaps even get it ready in time for 9.5.
I think it's absolutely unrealistic to get this into 9.5. There's barely
been any progress on the current (last!) commitfest - where on earth
should the energy come to make this patch ready? And why would that be
fair against all the others that have submitted in time?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-02-26 18:44:10 | Re: plpgsql versus domains |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-02-26 18:20:14 | Re: How to create virtual indexes on postgres |