Re: Partitioning WIP patch

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning WIP patch
Date: 2015-02-27 00:09:35
Message-ID: 54EFB5BF.3030801@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27-02-2015 AM 03:24, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-02-26 12:15:17 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 26-02-2015 AM 05:15, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I would love to have it for 9.5, but I guess the
>>> patch isn't nearly baked enough for that?
>
>> I'm not quite sure what would qualify as baked enough for 9.5 though we
>> can surely try to reach some consensus on various implementation aspects
>> and perhaps even get it ready in time for 9.5.
>
> I think it's absolutely unrealistic to get this into 9.5. There's barely
> been any progress on the current (last!) commitfest - where on earth
> should the energy come to make this patch ready? And why would that be
> fair against all the others that have submitted in time?
>

I realize and I apologize that it was irresponsible of me to have said
that; maybe got a bit too excited. I do not want to unduly draw people's
time on something that's not quite ready while there are other things
people have worked hard on to get in time. In all earnestness, I say we
spend time perfecting those things.

I'll add this into CF-JUN'15. I will keep posting updates meanwhile so
that when that commitfest finally starts, we will have something worth
considering.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-02-27 00:28:50 MemoryContext reset/delete callbacks
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-02-26 23:17:07 Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators