Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Planet posting policy

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>,PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2012-01-30 18:06:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:11:31PM +0100, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> I don't know exactly about rules but I am happy to read
> planet.postgresql with the current contents (so the rules looks good
> so far)
> I won't if its to read about internals of close-source products or
> derivate work from close-source product where removing the name of the
> close-source thing is going to remove the interest of the article for
> PostgreSQL and derivate open-source toools and projects.
> Also I am not interested in content I won't be able to use because of
> licence restriction. (not off-topic I believe)
> Maybe the next time someone got a post refused he/she can be asked if
> he agrees to be used to debate the rules change...

While I agree with you, I should point out that it is unclear what we
are _not_ seeing on Planet Postgres which could also be of interest.

I think the other comment wanting to see an example of what we are
missing might be the only way we can figure this out.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-01-30 18:11:16
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-01-30 18:05:17
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group