| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
| Date: | 2012-01-30 18:06:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20120130180601.GC24817@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:11:31PM +0100, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> I don't know exactly about rules but I am happy to read
> planet.postgresql with the current contents (so the rules looks good
> so far)
> I won't if its to read about internals of close-source products or
> derivate work from close-source product where removing the name of the
> close-source thing is going to remove the interest of the article for
> PostgreSQL and derivate open-source toools and projects.
> Also I am not interested in content I won't be able to use because of
> licence restriction. (not off-topic I believe)
>
> Maybe the next time someone got a post refused he/she can be asked if
> he agrees to be used to debate the rules change...
While I agree with you, I should point out that it is unclear what we
are _not_ seeing on Planet Postgres which could also be of interest.
I think the other comment wanting to see an example of what we are
missing might be the only way we can figure this out.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-01-30 18:11:16 | Re: Planet posting policy |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-01-30 18:05:17 | Re: Planet posting policy |