Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended
Date: 2009-08-07 21:17:42
Message-ID: 20090807211742.GH5290@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > Bruce asked me to look for places in the docs that mention that an
> > > ANALYZE is recommended, to mention the possibility that autovacuum takes
> > > care. This patch does that.
> >
> > I think you found the right places to touch, but is "let the autovacuum
> > daemon do it" sufficient? It seems like that needs some qualifiers
> > about whether autovacuum is enabled, how long you should expect to wait
> > for the stats to get updated, etc. It's probably not a good idea to
> > duplicate all that in each place, but maybe a link to the main
> > documentation about autovacuum is reasonable in each place.
>
> Sorry this fell through the cracks. How does this look? My idea would
> be to backpatch it to 8.3 and 8.4.

Committed, but backpatched to 8.4 only.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Best 2009-08-07 21:21:27 Re: \copy: unexpected response (4)
Previous Message Emmanuel Cecchet 2009-08-07 21:08:17 Re: Durability?