Re: Durability?

Tom Lane wrote:
> Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org> writes:
>
>> I got an error like this:
>>
>
>
>> ERROR: xlog flush request 1/C121E998 is not satisfied --- flushed only to 1/BCBCB440
>> CONTEXT: writing block 529 of relation 1663/233690/1247
>> WARNING: could not write block 529 of 1663/233690/1247
>> DETAIL: Multiple failures --- write error might be permanent.
>>
>
>
>> The xrecoff value (logs show 1/xrecoff) advances a few times during the day, but the message keeps appearing.
>>
>
> It looks like you've got a corrupted page in shared buffers, and every
> time the system tries to flush it to disk for a checkpoint, it fails.
>
> What I'd try for getting out this is to kill -9 some backend in order
> to force a database restart. Of course, if you want to investigate
> what caused it, you should dig around in shared memory first and try
> to get a copy of that buffer's contents.
>
Will the database be able to restart with a corrupted WAL?
If the database restarts, what transactions will be missing:
- just the block that couldn't be flushed?
- all transactions that were committed after the faulty block?
- more?

Thanks
Emmanuel