Re: \copy: unexpected response (4)

From: Neil Best <nbest(at)ci(dot)uchicago(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: \copy: unexpected response (4)
Date: 2009-08-07 21:21:27
Message-ID: 663c3ffc0908071421i57480766tbf8041cd73eb80e9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> BTW, the "SSL renegotiation failure" bit
> suggests that it could have been an OpenSSL bug not a real network
> lossage, so you might want to see how up-to-date your openssl libraries
> are.

Thanks for your comments, Tom. The operation seems more reliable if I
move the data to the server and do it across a local connection, which
I presume does not involve SSL, so that may be the weak link as you
surmise. Would you expect the SSL library problem more likely to be
on the server or the client, or is it just hard to say? Does either
of them have a facility that exposes the SSL version information or do
I have to go to the OS for that? Incidentally, I have not experienced
any sort of instability in my interactive sessions over an SSL
connection, so is it related to the \copy operation itself, the higher
volume of data across the connection, or the fact that I am asking it
to do multiple \copies in rapid succession, would you say? I expect
it's hard to say definitively, but maybe you or someone else can say
something about likelihoods. I appreciate the information.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-07 21:42:10 Re: Changing referenced primary key column type
Previous Message Andrus Moor 2009-08-07 20:57:13 Changing referenced primary key column type

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-08-07 21:29:32 Re: Alpha releases: How to tag
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-07 21:17:42 Re: docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended