Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 22:34 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > o Recovery, Replication, Hot Standby: We need a _final_ version
> > of any patches that are targeted for 8.4. There is so much activity in
> > this area I am unclear what is ready for 8.4.
> What do we mean by _final_? This a serious, polite question.
> Hot Standby hasn't had any serious code review yet by anybody, AFAIK.
> Hot Standby is not a "WIP" patch. >96-8% of the patch is identical to
> the way it was on Nov 1: ready for some review comments and
> testing/usability feedback. The later a review happens the less time we
> have to change anything within the patch in response to comments. If
> anybody is deliberately holding back on review, they need to talk to me,
> directly, soon.
> The main problem seems to be that all qualified developers are allocated
> elsewhere, or working on their own patches.
> If we want this in 8.4, then other developers or companies need to
> allocate some time to assist with its inclusion. All help greatly
I assume hot standby is ready for review/commit. The commit fest wiki
o Infrastructure changes for recovery
o Hot Standby - queries during archive recovery
o rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook
o Synchronous log-shipping replication
Are these all ready for review/commit? I assume all are except I don't
know the answer for the last one.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2009-01-05 20:08:22|
|Subject: Re: Status of issue 4593|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-01-05 19:55:28|
|Subject: Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)|