From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Plugin system like Firefox |
Date: | 2008-08-12 19:42:36 |
Message-ID: | 200808121942.m7CJgaV01470@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > I can't speak for anyone else, but I much prefer packages that make
> > use of my operating system's package management system rather than
> > rolling their own. If I need a perl package that I can't get through
> > yum, I build my own RPMs rather than installing through CPAN.
>
> I very much agree to that (well, s/RPM/DEB/).
>
> But AFAIK we also need to provide packages for OSes without a package
> management system. Windows being the most popular such OS.
>
> Which probably means we should provide something that can work on its
> own *or* through another package management system (very much like CPAN
> and others, again).
We don't get economies of scale without an OS-agnostic way of installing
packages. I realize many prefer their OS-native packaging system, but
that isn't the target audience of a packaging system that will increase
adoption.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-08-12 19:43:44 | Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-12 19:40:35 | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |