From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |
Date: | 2008-05-29 14:41:51 |
Message-ID: | 200805291441.m4TEfpb17758@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
> >> to get them finished up and sent in...
>
> > Has the s/\x09/ /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> > backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.
>
> No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
> do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?
I think everyone but me wanted it backpatched, so let's do it. I have
posted both patches but I am unable to apply your additions becuause I
don't understand them well enough.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-05-29 14:41:56 | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 14:41:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2008-05-29 14:41:56 | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 14:41:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases |