| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 14:14:38 |
| Message-ID: | 26571.1212070478@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
>> to get them finished up and sent in...
> Has the s/\x09/ /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.
No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin | 2008-05-29 14:19:46 | Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 14:12:55 | Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-29 14:41:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-29 13:51:18 | Re: pg_lzcompress patch for 8.3, 8.2 branch |