Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Date: 2008-05-29 14:58:48
Message-ID: 27353.1212073128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, nothing's been done about that AFAIK. What's the consensus,
>> do we want to change that behavior in 8.3.2?

> I think everyone but me wanted it backpatched, so let's do it. I have
> posted both patches but I am unable to apply your additions becuause I
> don't understand them well enough.

IIRC I made a few cosmetic cleanups along with the actual bug fix.
I'll take a look this afternoon and put it in.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-05-29 15:21:05 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-05-29 14:54:03 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2008-05-29 15:23:15 Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-05-29 14:46:18 Re: pg_lzcompress patch for 8.3, 8.2 branch