Re: Commit fest queue

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-10 14:15:29
Message-ID: 20080410141529.GE6610@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:36:23 -0400
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> >
> > > Bug/request trackers are great tools, but they're just tools. They
> > > don't replace actually having to do the work. Given the really
> > > trivial number of patches we're dealing with really just adding
> > > entries to a wiki page is a perfectly reasonable solution.
>
> I don't think so because it really isn't a change from what we have
> now. There isn't much difference from having a wiki page versus just
> having conversations on the patch list and moving email around.

If you don't think it's a change, I claim you haven't used either :-P

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-04-10 14:16:42 Re: Commit fest queue
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-04-10 14:12:56 Re: MSVC build broken with perl 5.10