| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? |
| Date: | 2007-02-22 15:00:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20070222150025.GE4276@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never
> >actually implemented. It's dead code.
> >
> >Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword
> >>
> >>Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>What am I missing?
> >>>Seems, it's about that
> >>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php
>
> Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-)
So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for
future readers as well ;-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-22 15:19:30 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | patrick | 2007-02-22 14:54:10 | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |