| From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? |
| Date: | 2007-02-22 17:02:24 |
| Message-ID: | 45DDCCA0.3010907@phlo.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never
>>> actually implemented. It's dead code.
>>>
>>> Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>>> Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword
>>>>
>>>> Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>>>>> What am I missing?
>>>>> Seems, it's about that
>>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php
>> Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-)
>
> So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for
> future readers as well ;-)
Here you go. I'm not subscribe to pgsql-patches, so I posted this here.
greetings, Florian Pflug
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg.noundo.patch | text/plain | 4.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-22 17:03:30 | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-02-22 16:38:26 | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |