Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-17 00:37:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Brendan Jurd escribió:
> On 2/17/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >Yes, it was: you now have two duplicate tests in timestamp.sql, and
> >no corresponding test in timestamptz.sql.  It looks to me like the
> >submitter intended to be testing timestamp_tbl in the former file
> >and the same tests against timestamptz_tbl in the latter.  Please
> >recheck the diff and fix.
> >
> Tom's right.  Looking back at the patch, it was a simple coding error.
> The test in timestamptz.sql should have been querying TIMESTAMPTZ_TBL
> not TIMESTAMP_TBL.  The intent was to run the same tests against both
> timestamp and timestamptz.

Thanks for the clarification.  Would you have a look at the tests as
they are now and confirm that that's what you wanted?

> I'll have a patch for proper handling of invalid formatting codes
> soon.  And I'll be sure to test it in every way I can find to do so.


Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-17 00:56:01
Subject: Re: Avg performance for int8/numeric
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-17 00:27:34
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group