Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Guillaume Lelarge" <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-17 01:40:20
Message-ID: 37ed240d0702161740v7f664740h6067bc88bcb4f7b3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On 2/17/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. Would you have a look at the tests as
> they are now and confirm that that's what you wanted?
>

Yes, the tests in HEAD right now are what I wanted. Although, while I
was in there I did notice a minor thing (another copy-paste error):
the timestamptz test is using a column alias that's not consistent
with other tests in the vicinity. Patch attached.

Attachment Content-Type Size
iso_regress_fix.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-17 01:51:50 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-17 01:22:21 Re: \prompt for psql