| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Date: | 2006-12-27 00:38:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20061227003845.GS28727@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Glen Parker wrote:
[slightly reformatted for sanity]
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >Is this something we want in 8.3? I am thinking visible/expired would
> >be clearer terms.
>
> I'd love to see this back patched into 8.2.1 if possible.
>
> Should I resubmit with new names?
I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better to
me. What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?
As for backpatching, you already knew the answer :-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-27 00:50:31 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-27 00:02:12 | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2006-12-27 01:31:15 | Re: Win32 WEXITSTATUS too simplistic |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-27 00:02:12 | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |