Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>, Postgresql Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Date: 2006-12-27 00:02:12
Message-ID: 10095.1167177732@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 13:59 -0800, Glen Parker wrote:
>> I'd love to see this back patched into 8.2.1 if possible.

> Probably not. We typically do not introduce new features into back
> releases.

And since this one would require an initdb, there is exactly zero chance
of it being back-patched ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-12-27 00:38:45 Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-26 23:57:10 Re: Rare corruption of pg_class index

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-12-27 00:38:45 Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-26 22:27:12 Re: Win32 WEXITSTATUS too simplistic