Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and

From: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>
To: Postgresql Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Date: 2006-12-26 21:59:46
Message-ID: 45919B52.1030401@nwlink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I'd love to see this back patched into 8.2.1 if possible.

Should I resubmit with new names?

-Glen

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Is this something we want in 8.3? I am thinking visible/expired would
> be clearer terms.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Glen Parker wrote:
>> This patch consists of two c functions to expose n_live_tuples and
>> n_dead_tuples, SQL functions to expose them to SQL land, and
>> corresponding fields added to pg_stat_all_tables.
>>
>> This has been discussed in general. The purpose is to allow
>> autovacuum-esq conditional vacuuming and clustering using SQL to
>> discover the required stats.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-26 22:26:25 Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-26 21:37:28 pgsql: Fix failure due to accessing an already-freed tuple descriptor in

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-26 22:26:25 Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-26 20:01:18 Re: Win32 WEXITSTATUS too simplistic