Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-18 21:26:56
Message-ID: 458707A0.4080701@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such
>> for effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers?
>
> You can't use "Mb" or "Gb" for shared_buffers either, because those are
> not accepted units.
>

Oh, you mean MB vs Mb. Man, it had to be that simple :)

Sorry about the noise.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glen Parker 2006-12-18 21:31:03 Second attempt, roll your own autovacuum
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-18 21:15:13 Re: effective_cache_size vs units