Re: old synchronized scan patch

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Eng <eng(at)intranet(dot)greenplum(dot)com>
Subject: Re: old synchronized scan patch
Date: 2006-12-07 00:14:52
Message-ID: CA0DA7C6-EA82-4A7A-97AC-47C94501F381@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Dec 7, 2006, at 8:01 , Jeff Davis wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 19:55 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Teamwork requires some synchronisation to be effective, but yeh there
>> needs to be a way to leave the Conga if its not working for you/them.
>>
>> I think we need the synchronisation to make concurrent scans
>> effective,
>> plus Brownian Scans doesnt have the same ring to it :-)
>
> How about "Scan Hinting", or "Smart Scans"?

I must admit, I think "Conga Scan" has a certain ring to it :)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dawid Kuroczko 2006-12-07 00:20:39 Re: Configuring BLCKSZ and XLOGSEGSZ (in 8.3)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-12-06 23:33:28 Re: Integrating Replication into Core