Major donors (was: Where to put the new donations page?)

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Major donors (was: Where to put the new donations page?)
Date: 2006-03-22 15:45:23
Message-ID: 20060322154523.GH15742@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:54:52AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 2) Do major (> $1000) financial sponsors get to be Sponsors at
> www.postgresql.org/about/Sponsors, or do we put them somewhere else? (we'll
> probably need to have this argument on Advocacy as well).

Since I haven't seen this on -advocacy yet...

The only argument I can think of for seperating large donors from
corporate sponsors is that some folks might have rather different levels
of interest about each one. Having a number of corporations officially
sponsoring the project arguably carries more weight than the same number
of individual believers, even if they do have deep pockets.

It also might not make sense from a financial perspective. $1k is quite
a lot for most individuals, but it's a tiny sum for all but the smallest
companies.

But of course, my opinions might be a bit biased here... :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2006-03-22 19:20:20 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Major donors (was: Where to put the new donations page?)
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-03-22 01:48:18 Re: Access your MySQL database for maintenance without a password

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2006-03-22 19:20:20 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Major donors (was: Where to put the new donations page?)
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-03-21 20:43:53 Re: human validation on post comments