Re: human validation on post comments

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: human validation on post comments
Date: 2006-03-21 20:43:53
Message-ID: 200603211543.53515.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 12:49, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Pardon if this has already been brought up as I am late to
> > the thread, but why can't we just use a "unseen by default"
> > policy in which all posts are not made viewable until
> > approved by a moderator?
>
> We already do this, and have done for a while (before that they used to
> be show-by-default, but can be rejected, which missed a lot). This is
> AFAIK about making life for the moderators easie r:-)
>

Honestly I don't find the amount of spam as annoying as the amount of
pointless posts and/or support questions... but if you really want such a
system, why not have one that switches randomly between captcha, math
problems, and anagrams and also verifies the referer url. This wouldn't be
foolproof, but the point here is only to make it more of a hassle than the
next guys site.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-22 15:45:23 Major donors (was: Where to put the new donations page?)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-03-21 17:49:07 Re: human validation on post comments