| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Marc Herbert <Marc(dot)Herbert(at)continuent(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Date: | 2005-12-08 18:11:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200512081911.30002.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-odbc |
Marc Herbert wrote:
> We are developping a middleware and are not free to choose our data
> types.
I was thinking the ODBC driver should provide the appropriate mapping.
> As far as i know, the implementation of bytea and large objects in
> the database are totally different and I suspect there are good
> reasons to use either one of them, depending on the actual data and
> application involved.
There is no real reason to use large objects for anything instead of
bytea.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ludek Finstrle | 2005-12-09 01:15:13 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Marc Herbert | 2005-12-08 13:59:23 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ludek Finstrle | 2005-12-09 01:15:13 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Previous Message | noreply | 2005-12-08 15:43:41 | [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction |