From: | Marc Herbert <Marc(dot)Herbert(at)continuent(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
Date: | 2005-12-08 13:59:23 |
Message-ID: | 871x0nr8p0.fsf@meije.emic.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-odbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Marc Herbert wrote:
>> Ludek Finstrle <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz> writes:
>> > Type oid doesn't represent only large objects.
>>
>> This is IMHO the original sin. oid is overloaded as both an internal
>> type and something the basic user has to play with.
>
> Why aren't you using bytea? Is that not supported by the ODBC driver?
We are developping a middleware and are not free to choose our data
types.
As far as i know, the implementation of bytea and large objects in the
database are totally different and I suspect there are good reasons to
use either one of them, depending on the actual data and application
involved.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-08 18:11:29 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-08 09:55:12 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | noreply | 2005-12-08 15:43:41 | [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-08 13:54:14 | Re: 07.03.02.08 snapshot version for download |