| From: | Ludek Finstrle <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Date: | 2005-12-09 01:15:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20051209011513.GA8293@soptik.pzkagis.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-odbc |
Hello
> > As far as i know, the implementation of bytea and large objects in
> > the database are totally different and I suspect there are good
> > reasons to use either one of them, depending on the actual data and
> > application involved.
>
> There is no real reason to use large objects for anything instead of
> bytea.
There is a reason when you have already written application.
I don't use lo. I'm new in development of psqlODBC and one request
was: lo changed between 7.3 and 7.4
I try to solve it. You can find it in pgsql-odbc archive. It has
same subject.
I'm sorry I didn't read FAQ for psqlODBC earlier.
Regards,
Luf
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Herbert | 2005-12-09 10:46:01 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-08 18:11:29 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | noreply | 2005-12-09 01:29:03 | [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000475 ] SEGFAULT during SQLCancel |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-08 18:11:29 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |