Re: Open source database comparison

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Leonard Soetedjo <stelar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open source database comparison
Date: 2005-10-15 23:10:38
Message-ID: 20051015231038.GD86144@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Another good question is why aren't they comparing 8.1 if they're
comparing MySQL 5.0?

On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:19:02PM +0800, Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw this open source database comparison:
> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/29480?trk=DXRSS_LATEST
>
> I'm quite new to PostgreSQL features, but shouldn't PostgreSQL already
> have "SQL stored procedure"? Is "SQL stored procedure" something
> different from the usual stored procedure? And it also mark PostgreSQL
> as having no full-text search. Isn't Tsearch2 being used to do that,
> even though it's not on by default?
>
> I'm just concerned if the matrix is giving the wrong info about
> PostgreSQL :)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Leonard Soetedjo
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Nelles 2005-10-15 23:18:01 Re: Open source database comparison
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-10-15 22:56:54 Re: Open source database comparison