Re: Open source database comparison

From: Christoph Nelles <evilazrael(at)evilazrael(dot)de>
To:
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open source database comparison
Date: 2005-10-15 23:18:01
Message-ID: 43518E29.6040906@evilazrael.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Jim C. Nasby schrieb:
> Another good question is why aren't they comparing 8.1 if they're
> comparing MySQL 5.0?

A good question would be : Would you think if a MySQL employee made this
comparision, would it be neutral?

About the author (on the third page) :
"Uday Parmar is Head of Sales and Marketing at Daffodil Software, where
he is responsible for corporate sales, account management, strategic
planning, and business analysis. Uday holds a Bachelors degree in
Statistics from Mumbai University, an MBA in Marketing and HR, and a
Masters in Management from Durham Business School, England. . "

>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:19:02PM +0800, Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I saw this open source database comparison:
>>http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/29480?trk=DXRSS_LATEST
>>
>>I'm quite new to PostgreSQL features, but shouldn't PostgreSQL already
>>have "SQL stored procedure"? Is "SQL stored procedure" something
>>different from the usual stored procedure? And it also mark PostgreSQL
>>as having no full-text search. Isn't Tsearch2 being used to do that,
>>even though it's not on by default?
>>
>>I'm just concerned if the matrix is giving the wrong info about
>>PostgreSQL :)
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Leonard Soetedjo
>>
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>
>
>

Christoph Nelles

Attachment Content-Type Size
evilazrael.vcf text/x-vcard 135 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-15 23:34:00 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-15 23:10:38 Re: Open source database comparison