Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date: 2005-07-11 16:22:06
Message-ID: 200507110922.06888.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon, Tom,

> > Will do. Results in a few days.

Actually, between the bad patch on the 5th and ongoing STP issues, I don't
think I will have results before I leave town. Will e-mail you offlist to
give you info to retrieve results.

> Any chance you'd be able to do this with
>
> ext3 and a filesystem blocksize of 4096 bytes
>
> PostgreSQL built with a blocksize of 4096

Hmmm ... I'm not sure the current test supports these kinds of options. Will
ask Mark.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ferruccio Zamuner 2005-07-11 16:22:26 Re: fetch_search_path() and elog.c
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-07-11 16:16:18 Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review