Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Russell Smith" <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, "Postgres Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date: 2005-07-07 16:59:58
Message-ID: 200507070959.59181.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> Josh, is OSDL up enough that you can try another comparison run?

Thankfully, yes.

> If so, please undo the previous patch (which disabled page dumping
> entirely) and instead try removing this block of code, starting
> at about xlog.c line 620 in CVS tip:

Will do. Results in a few days.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-07-07 17:11:21 Re: A couple of p.tches for PostgreSQL 64bit support
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-07-07 16:58:02 Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support