Re: diference in dates in minutes

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: diference in dates in minutes
Date: 2005-02-26 21:16:10
Message-ID: 20050226211610.GA4472@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 15:14:02 -0500,
Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> wrote:
> You probably want to convert the dates to timestamps, subtract them to
> get an interval, extract the epoch to get timme in seconds and then divide
> by 60 to get time in minutes.
>
> The converting date to timestamp part isn't trivial. You need to decide
> on what you mean when you do this. If you really have timestamps in the
> first place, then you can skip the covernsion step.
>
> They are dates and I did find I could do date - date to give me an interval
> date_part('epoch',date-date) returns in secs so /60

date - date won't give you an interval, it will give you an integer of some
sort.

> This appeared to work ok without converting to time stamps, but maybe I am
> missing it if it is not correct as the example I looked at was a large
> difference. The app is analyzing Tlogs and the difference should never be
> too large, so I will further analyze it with real data.
> As always I appreciate the help.
> My real question is this an interval then and will it be depreciated soon?

The Interval type won't be depreciated. Using to_char to convert intervals
to strings is being depreciated. This won;t cause a problem for extract
or similar functions.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-02-27 04:20:43 Re: AutoCommit and DDL
Previous Message Don Drake 2005-02-26 20:56:52 AutoCommit and DDL